What can magic do? Anything? What, then, can any given magic-user do? Everything?

Any fantasy RPG that puts magic in has to answer that question. The above, by the way, are wrong answers.

It’s a thing that I notice occasionally, in fantasy fiction, and in cough certain RPGs, that magic quickly becomes the only thing that matters. Clever magic systems, clever magic uses, powerful magic users, and so on become the event horizon that devours everything else. The things that contribute to this, I think, include the denigration of skill and what it can accomplish, no limits on the scope of magic’s accomplishments, and an acceleration of the rate at which it achieves them. Certain problems with 3.X notwithstanding, this also ends up producing something that I don’t prefer aesthetically.

What do I see as the major mistakes to avoid?

  • Magic has no effect or outcome outside of its scope – any possible effect you want can be achieved.
  • Magic has free and immediate effect, meaning there won’t be circumstances where the magic solution isn’t an option.
  • Magic has nothing mystical about it – it’s a technology of perfectly repeatable mechanistic effects (frequently with no cost), becoming a kind of pseudo-physics (or as often, pseudo-high-energy-physics) complete with jargon (c.f. Exalted’s motonic physics).
  • Skill-based actions have limits based on a less permissive view of what can be accomplished, or a resolution system that ends up behaving punitively when engaged with.

Here’s how I try to avoid them:

Magic has a limited set of areas of effect (the pre-defined Arts). There’s room for expansion of the list, but any given Art has a well-defined area of effect (which combines with the fact that any given character has a maximum number of Arts they can know, and must eventually balance learning further Arts and advancing in power with those they currently know). Each art has a list of specific instant techniques, and that’s all you get. Unless you’re a magician… then you get ritual magic, an ability to create variations upon your chosen themes. In balance, they have a heavy cost in time – the lowest-power ritual takes ten minutes, which is the length of a dungeon delve/exploration turn.

The re-mysticization of magic is an item that I haven’t tried to make mechanical (the irony would be a bit much). With design, I resist making magic into a physics – for example, Conveyance is about motion through space, and so should handle haste-like and teleportation effects (note to self: put enhanced movement stuff in), but it is not general space-bending magic. In play I prefer to handle this via narration – having the player describe the trappings of magic-workings, having nearby factors influence the results, and so on. The player’s intent is respected, but the fiction is not mechanistic.

Advertisements

3 thoughts on “On Magic

  1. I find myself speculating as to how these troubles got into the current D&D paradigm. Mechanistic effects are necessary given the assumption that GM and players are adversarial, where any ambiguity is a chance for one or the other side of the table to fuck the other over. Binary success/fail mechanics put a limit on how attractive a skill-focused character build will be: once you can reliably pass whatever the “really hard” difficulty rating is, further investment in skill doesn’t do much for you. Unbounded capability for magic spells had to have been reinforced, if not originated, by the business model of selling spell lists as supplements.

    Like

    1. I think a few things happened – one is the supplement treadmill. But I came into the hobby in late 2E and while it certainly had its own supplement treadmill (various tomes comprised only of spells, plus Complete X books, and so on), I never got the impression that it was quite as broken as, to pick an example, 3E.

      The other thing that happened was that magic wasn’t meant to be universally a binary effect – between the chance to interrupt casting (drastically reduced in 3E) and the chance of resisting effects (drastically reduced in 3E), there were parts of the system in place to limit the overall effectiveness of magic. Of course, 3E upended that, and then introduced explicitly user-craftable magic sources (scrolls, potions, and wands), so the effectiveness of a magic user was drastically increased. At the same time, skill use devolved from a conversation or straightforward roll (I’ve heard of just rolling a d6 in several OSR games) to a roll-under-stat (and the increasingly less optional proficiency system) to 3E’s long skill list and skill point-starved classes, which served mostly to make characters less capable.

      Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s